Message 5

Hello to all viewers. I decided to add more info on the subject of "End Times", as it is called, which means the last years leading to the predicted return of Jesus Christ to earth, and includes some kind of worldwide apocalypse and the rise of an evil ruler who will take over everything. Most people, I think, have a sense that something like that is going on, that some kind of major global trouble is approaching--climate disaster, war, political and social breakdown, an economic collapse. I've been studying these things alot and want to give you my latest findings and what I think, based on those findings, is going to happen, and a basic timetable and picture of these events. I've discovered things I don't think anybody else knows, or has figured out--they have some pieces of the puzzle but not all of them.

Alot of people just don't know what is real and what is just speculation, error, nonsense--who do you believe, of all the people predicting one thing or another. Christians, New Agers, Native American prophets, scientists...is there anything solid that we can count on, that is certain?

One of the most important bits of information, most important and solid evidences, is, I think, the prophecies of Nostradamus, especially the ones about the three "antichrists". Nostradamus tells us that in the not-too-distant future there will arise three antichrists who will wreak havoc on the world: first, "an emperor" from Corsica, whose name will be "Paunayloron" (this is obviously "Napoleon" with the syllables scrambled around a bit--Nostradamus often does things like this so the prophecies won't be too obvious)--second, "Hister" from central Europe, who will be "a captain of Greater Germany", whose political symbol will be a "crooked cross" (swastika) and who "will mesmerize many people with his extraordinary oratory".

The obvious implication here is that if Nostradamus is right about the first two antichrists chances are he's going to be right about the third one, also. Nostradamus scholar Erika Cheetham says the prophecies indicate that the third antichrist will already be operating behind the scenes in the 1980's. Psychic Jean Dixon said he would be born in February of 1962. I think this third antichrist is the same person as the infamous "Antichrist" of the Bible's Book of Revelation, so that's an important link between two sources, and evidence that both are accurate. The point is that Nostradamus' prophecies are an accurate and reliable source of information, one of the most reliable that we have. What could be more blatantly obvious than that "Hister", a "captain of Greater Germany", is Hitler. So Nostradamus is the most rock solid information source that I know of (about the future), aside from the prophecies of the Bible.

Religious folks, Christians, tend to dismiss Nostradamus' predictions as "vague and imprecise, can be interpreted in many ways". I disagree. Christians seem to think Nostradamus is "the occult"--Christian belief is that only God can predict the future--I agree, but might it be that that is where Nostradamus' predictions are from? I think the supreme being can give information to whoever he wants to, and that that is the source of Nostradamus' prophecies.

I said above that I've discovered things that probably no one else knows about. That's one of the purposes of this website, to get this important information to people. Many people are lost and confused, I think, not able to decide what to think, who's right. All kinds of different groups (and individuals) are claiming to be right, the only ones who are right. Which ones are? Institutional Christianity, as I've said in previous messages, tends to arrogantly claim to be right and infallible, but I think they are riddled with errors and false teachings. It's just an inaccurate and distorted version of Christianity. Their Jesus just isn't the real Jesus, to put it bluntly. The basic story is true--no doubt--but their ideas and interpretations beyond that, many of them, are wildly off, I think (based on good evidence I've seen). They are a ship, lost on a vast ocean, a ship that has lost its bearings, its navigation instruments, so that it is badly off course. It doesn't know where it is, and doesn't even know it's lost, to begin with. There's no "land" in sight, it has little information to go on, in terms of navigation, orientation. So, they pitifully cling to one idea or another, one version of doctrine, refusing to admit that they have little certainty it's right, steadfastly claiming that it's infallible and divinely inspired. I feel sorry for them, to a degree, but wonder why they don't go to the supreme source for an answer. Many preachers, priests and such seem to think they are "on a first name basis" with the supreme being--well then, if they really are, why don't they ask him for help? Maybe because they don't want to lose the version of doctrine that they have, already. In other words, they have their own little religious world, one that they like, and they don't want that to change.

I've been disgusted by this kind of stuff, this "religion building", for a while. The orthodox Protestants, many of them, have this "Rapture" business, in which they think they are going to be "airlifted" off the planet before the third antichrist rises to power (well then who is that fellow going to persecute? they say, people who convert later, but that seems to me a bit far-fetched). But the Catholics also have a major false (in my opinion) "End Times" scenario. According to it, the "Return of Christ" is just the Catholic Church--it is "Christ on earth"--there will never be any reappearance of Jesus in physical form as last time--never, if I understand correctly--poor Jesus is stuck in the spirit world permanently--he can't live another lifetime as he did 2000 years ago. The prophecies of Christ "ruling the nations from Jerusalem with a rod of iron" are just "symbolism" or they refer to the Catholic Church. Mary, it turns out, will rule the world through the Catholic Church. Mary will be the one who defeats the Antichrist and "crushes the head of the Serpent" (Satan, I think that means). Also, most of what's in the Book of Revelation is out (from what I've heard on Catholic television)--no Battle of Armageddon after a three-and-a-half year "Great Tribulation". There will instead be "Three Days of Darkness" and some kind of "Chastisement". Mary will be in charge of it all--Jesus will be a marginal figure, a hapless, irrelevant, weak non-entity floating somewhere in the spirit world. He'll continue to be, according to Catholic dogma, what he's always been: a weak, irrelevant non-entity, and Mary will rule the Christian universe. The world will then be under Catholic dominion, supposedly, and there will be "an era of peace".

That's the Catholic version of the End Times, from what I've been seeing on Catholic TV, and it strikes me as highly questionable.

So, we've established a few benchmarks of information that tell us what's going on and where we are in these times, which are the times of the third antichrist (and the Book of Revelation--it's important to know that). This enables us to "navigate" on the map of history. Alot of people seem to be lost, these days, they don't know what to think of all the ominous things that are going on now, since the recent events in the Middle East and what appears to be the beginning of a third world war. What people don't seem to remember is that the spirit world is the missing piece of the puzzle, which few people are talking about. That spirit world controls probably everything that goes on here in the material world. In that spirit world there are, as I've said before on this website (and there's evidence for this, it isn't just my opinion), only two powers, the Supreme Spirit which is source of all good, and another, created spirit traditionally called Satan or "The Devil", who is leader and "master" of all evil, everywhere in the universe. So, everything that occurs in the material world traces back to one of those two powers. It doesn't matter what political regime or form of government there is, or who's in charge here on this or any other planet, everything still traces back to the spirit world, and one of its two power centers.

So, nowadays with the ominous events going on, and talk of a third world war looming, people tend to be afraid, worried, lost, confused--what do we do. Should we try to "survive", by abandoning civilization and retreating to the wilderness, with stockpiles of supplies? Maybe, in some cases. How do you handle the situation. The best thing is to turn to the Supreme Spirit and ask that being for guidance--let it tell you what to do. Only it can figure everything out and devise a plan for these "End Times", terrifying as they are starting to be. It's plan for you will be better than yours. In fact, that will surely be the only way to survive or not be overwhelmed. Let it take control of your life, tell you what to do.

There are ways to handle evil people, also. This is a major concern, now, with the world being devoured by crime. People wonder how can they protect themselves and their families from criminals, humans who have deteriorated to the level of amoral animals. Human beings, it appears, are prone to, under great duress, turning into this kind of thing. I think what happens is, as duress increases (such as in a terrible crisis/disaster situation), at some point people "break", and the "id" takes over, the "id" being the lower, "animal" part of human nature. So there will undoubtedly be many people who will "break" like this, as things get worse, and be reduced to amoral marauders whose only motivation is self-preservation. In addition to this there are the usual inherently evil people who exist even when times are good. They use a typical series of tactics, from what I've seen, to gain power over others. The main one would be intimidation--then, provocation. The way you handle that is, don't respond to a provocation. A provocation is an insult or minor offense which doesn't do you any real harm, but is intended to anger you, so that you lash out at the provoker with something that does do real harm. Then, the provoker has a right to do you real harm, because that's what you tried to do to him. In other words, the provoker got you to start a fight--then he can say, "I was just defending myself--this person tried to do me harm". That's how that tactic works. So, never respond to something that is just a provocation, which might be an insult or smart remark, or...a slap on the cheek...

Does that sound familiar, remind you of something? "If someone slaps you on the cheek, turn and offer the other cheek, that he may strike it also." I think this is what this legendary teaching of Jesus Christ is about. Most people probably think this means you're not allowed to fight back. I disagree, and think it means don't respond to a provocation. The way it works is, if you don't respond to the provocation, that tactic fails. But also, I think that the good spirit powers will then have the right to take action to stop the provoker, so he can't do you any more harm. That's their law, and they, the good spirit powers, always enforce their own law. So what Jesus was saying is a tactic to put provokers like that out of business, permanently, I think. Not that it's a sin to defend yourself.

You'll notice that all the really good, smart warriors use this device. They never respond to just a provocation, but only to a real threat. If somebody makes a sudden move for some kind of weapon, that's a real threat. That's totally different from just a smart remark, is a different ballgame. There's a certain line that is crossed, which indicates that somebody is intending to do you real harm. Watch some of the great movie tough guys, warriors, and see how they handle different situations, how they distinguish between just a provocation--insult, smart remark, even, at times, a slap in the face (in one of his movies, John Wayne is arguing with some pesky, foolish individual, who at one point actually slaps Wayne in the face--a few minutes later, this guy does it again, and finally Wayne says, "That's the second time you hit me--don't ever do it again!")--and a real threat. They always let a provocation fly past them, but instantly go into action if they see something that looks like an attempt to do real harm.

So it looks like even John Wayne abides by Jesus' injunction to "turn the other cheek"...because Wayne is actually a pushover and a "wimp"? No, I think because that famous biblical injunction is a method of protecting yourself, not sitting there and getting beaten to a pulp, as religion leads us to believe.

But back to the subject of the "End Times". I think what's coming upon us in the near future isn't anything nice. But I also think that the spirit world is going to be helping us. That spirit world can rescue anyone, anywhere, at any time, with sheer supernatural power, which is why I think this "Rapture" business is so foolish. God doesn't need anything like that, I don't think. I don't think we're all going to live forever or survive this Apocalypse--but that doesn't mean it will all be just doom and gloom, either. My plan is, do as much as possible to prepare materially, in terms of supplies and such, then let God do the rest. Also, I don't think we need to be overly worried about dyin'. There's good evidence that it's just a return to the spirit state, which is where we were, originally, anyway. I think you'll be the same, basically, same mind, emotions, memories, you'll remember your life, but you'll be free of the difficulties and struggles of this incarnate existence. We can just rest and let mind and spirit wander. Probably at first you'll be "zonked", for a while, then gradually regain awareness of the spirit world. You'll probably soon encounter other spirits. I've read that there are benevolent spirits, "angels", who help people adjust back to the spirit state.

I think it's a misperception, the idea that it's some dark horrible fate--dyin', that is. Wouldn't be surprised if it's far better than being here in the material plane. This doesn't mean it's O.K. to bring about such a thing, just that, I don't think we need to be inordinately preoccupied with or terrified of it, since it was established by the spirit dimension, and thus is controlled by it. I think in our ancient past we knew this, instinctively, but in modern times have lost this a priori understanding. Back then, when we were "primitive" tribespeople, we had little fear of death, because we were in close communion with the cosmos, nature and the spirit world, had a holistic "oneness" with those. There were not all kinds of conflicts and lacks of understanding, between spirit world and incarnation, male and female, humans and nature, reason and intuition. There was a harmony and functionality between all the various facets of our lives and our beings. We were not "out of balance", so to speak, in all kinds of ways. Modern psychologists would call that "dysfunctionality", "neurosis" and such. American Indians called it "koyanisquatsi": "life out of balance".

So, as regards the "End Times", get right with your own creator--the "Great Spirit"--and your own spirit, first. Then you'll have wisdom on everything else.